Risk and control assessment is a systematic process to assess the operational inherent risk, part of horizontal function across verticals like financial institutions- banks, capital markets, insurance, to identify any material risks or loss.

Risk assessment methodology is based on the institution’s risk management framework, driven by:

  • First line of defense being customer service,
  • Second line of defense being compliance unit,
  • Third line of defense being the audit.

The risk & control self-assessment process is a structured highly operational in nature, which will enable us to identify, assess and mitigate operational risks by assessing the effectiveness of existing controls.

The risk & control self- assessment process will enable us to assess the firm’s internal controls by examining their design and operating effectiveness in mitigating various inherent risks. As this process is quite structured, the risk officers will repeat the assessment process on a periodic basis, owned by the risk owners and control owners ideally belong to the first line of defense team.

The key focus of this risk assessment process is on core dimensions such as business processes, risk events, controls, legal entities, and cost centers. The frequency of the assessment may be either quarterly, semiannual, or annual.

Typical life cycles of the risk assessment process executed by the human agents are:

1. Risk assessment framework prepared by the second line of defense compliance officers.

2. Risk library and Control library prepared and routinely updated by the 1st LOD.

  • Risk Response, Risk and control scoring data prepared and disseminated by the 2nd LOD.
  • The Audit department, as the third line of defense, validates and records risk and control assessment scores.

The best transformation lever to implement for enhance operational efficiency is to infuse the agentic AI services with a focus to eradicate the manual process of risk assessments and reduce staff fatigue and their operational errors. 

Conceptual understanding along with our POV of the Agentic AI services:

To intelligently automate and enhance Risk & Control Assessment using Agentic AI services, we can design a multi-agent system where each AI agent performs a specialized function aligned with the traditional responsibilities of human actors across the three lines of defense.

Below is a breakdown of diverse agentic AI services required and organized by function, responsibility, and defense line:

1st Line of Defense (Business / Operations / Risk Owners)

1. Control Data Agent

Operational purpose: Continuously collect and maintain data on existing controls, updates from business units, and control test results. These controls are derived from multiple policies and standard operating procedures documentation.

  • Tasks:
    • Interface with systems which have control repository along with control owners.
    • Controls are associated with risks and process data to identify any non-functioning controls during assessment.
    • Update the Control Library, in case of any new control additions.
    • Detect control design gaps or changes via data analytics, vis-vis regulatory policies, or internal procedural upgrades.
    • Control assessment focuses on any weakness in control design or control operating effectiveness.
  • AI Capabilities: Natural Language Processing (NLP), Robotic Process Automation (RPA), Knowledge Graphs.

AI Solutions:

  • Natural Language Processing (NLP): For extracting controls from unstructured sources like policy documents, SOPs, audit reports.
  • Robotic Process Automation (RPA): To automate data collection from multiple systems and update control libraries.
  • Knowledge Graphs: To map relationships between controls, risks, and processes for better traceability and reasoning.

2. Operational Process Mapping Agent

  • Business Purpose: Map and monitor business processes for any gaps prompting inherent risks.
  • Tasks:
    • Extract workflows & tasks to be attended from BPM tools.
    • Identify critical control points, which are mapped to risks and other dimensional reference points.
    • Simulate process scenarios to highlight potential weaknesses.
  • AI Capabilities: Process Mining, Simulation Modeling, NLP.

AI Solutions:

  • Process Mining: Automatically discovers, monitors, and improves real processes by extracting knowledge from event logs in BPM systems.
  • Simulation Modeling: Uses statistical models and simulations (e.g., Monte Carlo) to test different scenarios and identify potential risk bottlenecks.
  • NLP: To understand and convert semi-structured workflow documents into formal process models.

2nd Line of Defense (Compliance / Risk Function)

3. Risk Identification & Scoring Agent

  • Purpose: Continuously identify inherent & emerging risks and score them based on internal and external data.
  • Tasks:
    • Leverage external news, regulatory changes, and internal incidents.
    • Calculate inherent and residual risk scores, which will have computation viz, frequency & severity of the risk
    • Continuously update the risk profile of the processes
    • Recommend priority areas for assessment.
  • AI Capabilities: Machine Learning (ML), Anomaly Detection, Sentiment Analysis.

  AI Solutions:

  • Machine Learning (ML): For pattern recognition in historical incidents and emerging data trends to detect new risks.
  • Anomaly Detection: Identifies deviations in behavior or data that could indicate emerging risks.
  • Sentiment Analysis: Processes external data (news, social media, regulatory updates) to identify negative sentiment or early risk indicators.

4. Assessment & Response Agent

  • Purpose: Automate the preparation and distribution of risk assessments.
  • Tasks:
    • Populate risk templates based on historical data.
    • Suggest responses and control improvements.
    • Trigger workflows for review and sign-off.
  • AI Capabilities: LLMs for structured documentation, AutoML for recommendation systems.

AI Solutions:

  • Large Language Models (LLMs): To auto-generate structured assessment documentation and response recommendations.
  • AutoML (Automated Machine Learning): Optimizes models that recommend risk responses and control adjustments with minimal human tuning.

5. Control Effectiveness Evaluation Agent

  • Purpose: Evaluate whether controls are effectively mitigating the risk.
  • Tasks:
    • Analyze historical performance of controls.
    • Use audit and incident data to assess control effectiveness.
    • Provide visualizations for decision-making.
  • AI Capabilities: Predictive Analytics, Reinforcement Learning.

AI Solutions:

  • Predictive Analytics: Uses past control performance data to predict future effectiveness.
  • Reinforcement Learning: Continuously improves control strategies based on trial-and-error feedback (e.g., which controls most effectively mitigate specific risks).

3rd Line of Defense – Audit Management

6. Audit Readiness & Compliance Agent

  • Purpose: Ensure all assessments and documentation are audit ready.
  • Tasks:
    • Maintain audit trails.
    • Validate data lineage and source.
    • Cross-verify assessment logic for independence.
  • AI Capabilities: Explainable AI (XAI), Rule-based Systems, Traceability Frameworks.

AI Solutions:

  • Explainable AI (XAI): Provides transparency in model decisions (important for audits).
  • Rule-Based Systems: Codify regulatory compliance rules to verify if processes meet audit criteria.
  • Traceability Frameworks: Ensure full visibility from data origin to decision-making (e.g., data lineage tracking).

Cross-functional Agents

7. Knowledge Management Agent

  • Purpose: Create, maintain, and update the institutional knowledge base on risks and controls.
  • Tasks:
    • Train in past risk assessments, audits, incidents.
    • Answer queries from business users.
  • AI Capabilities: LLM fine-tuning, Semantic Search, Ontology Management.

AI Solutions:

  • LLM Fine-tuning: Tailors a general-purpose LLM to the organization’s specific risk/control domain for answering queries.
  • Semantic Search: Allows intelligent search across documents using context and meaning rather than keywords.
  • Ontology Management: Structures and updates the risk-control knowledge domain (taxonomy, definitions, relationships).

8. Collaboration & Orchestration Agent

  • Purpose: Coordinate tasks among different agents and human stakeholders.
  • Tasks:
    • Route tasks to appropriate agents or humans for validations.
    • Escalate risks that need mitigation or remain unresolved.
    • Schedule periodic assessments automatically.
  • AI Capabilities: Multi-Agent Orchestration, Workflow Engines.

AI Solutions:

  • Multi-Agent Orchestration: Enables coordination between various AI agents and human roles.
  • Workflow Engines: Manages task routing, approval hierarchies, and escalations across defense lines.

9. Change Detection & Alerting Agent

  • Purpose: Detect deviations from expected control behavior change or emerging external risks.
  • Tasks:
    • Monitor key risk indicators (KRIs) or key control indicators (KCI’s)
    • Alert on anomalies or threshold breaches.
  • AI Capabilities: Streaming Data Analysis, Event Processing, Alert Prioritization.

AI Solutions:

  • Streaming Data Analysis: Continuously monitors data streams for KRI/KCI metrics.
  • Event Processing: Identifies and responds to significant events (e.g., threshold breaches).
  • Alert Prioritization Models: Uses ML to score the severity and urgency of alerts.

10. Reporting & Dashboard Build Agents

  • Purpose: To update & build a risk register & control register to submit to the board
  • Tasks:
    • Collate all the data from the risk profile & control profile agents
    • Create the risk & control register by giving a accurate picture of the status of the control mitigation aspects
    • Collect the output data from risk appetite matrix to measure if the residual risk if more than the inherent risk

AI Capabilities: Streaming Data Analysis, Event Processing, Alert Prioritization.

AI Solutions:

  • Data Aggregation Engines: Merge multiple sources (risk, control, audit) into coherent summaries.
  • Data Visualization Tools: AI-enhanced tools like Power BI with AI visuals, Tableau with ML predictions.
  • Risk Appetite Matrix Calculators: Use rule-based logic and ML to evaluate whether residual risk is acceptable based on organization-defined thresholds.

Describing the effective elements to conduct an effective risk assessment:

Depicted a sample risk assessment template which is an output created by the 1st LOD compliance officers and 2nd LOD compliance officers.

Sample Template: Risk & Self Control Self-Assessment

Submitting a sample template, to illustrate the end-to-end RCSA process

About the Authors

Dr. Gopichand Agnihotram

Director of AI/ML

Dr. Gopichand, as the Director of AI, brings over 19 years of experience in AI and ML technologies to his role. Additionally, he is a Principal Member of the Distinguished Technical Staff at Wipro. Dr. Gopichand is a prolific innovator with over 40 patents and 50 publications in esteemed platforms such as Springer and IEEE. His significant contributions to the field of AI and ML highlight his expertise and commitment to advancing technological frontiers.

Joydeep Sarkar

Senior Architect, Blockchain, AI/ML

Joydeep is a senior architect with more than two decades of experience in distributed and decentralized computing and artificial intelligence. He is also a Principal in Wipro’s Distinguished Members of Technical Service, focused on building AI/GenAI engineering solutions.

Venkatesh Balasubramaniam

Consulting Partner, Financial Crime Compliance & GRC Domain Practice Head

Venkatesh is a consulting leader with more than 28 years of corporate experience. He specializes in the regulatory compliance domain and brings multiple years of consulting and technology transformation experience covering the areas such as fraud, AML, KYC/CDD, sanctions, GRC, and regulatory reporting. He is also a Principal in Wipro’s Distinguished Members of Technical Service, focused on building AI/GenAI engineering solutions to address customers’ business and technology challenges. Currently he is a global practice head for the GRC and Financial Crime domain and holds qualified professional memberships in the Compliance fraternity – CAMS and CFCS.