| MEDICAL DEVICES
|
| Case Study |
|
 |
|
| |
| Re-architecture and Re-factoring
of DICOM SCU and SCP components |
| |
 |
| |
| The idea |
| To deliver a complete DICOM middleware
architecture and implementation enabling the customer
to adopt industry accepted standards. |
| |
| The client |
| Global Leader in Diagnostic Imaging
Products. |
| |
| The business challenge |
| Modality acceptability and usability
was hindered due to cumbersome integration process
with other information systems like HIS, RIS, PACS.
A major imperative for the client was to attain
performance and quality improvements of existing
DICOM services. The client had restricted technological
resources to undertake the entire project. Rapid
development and seamless deployment of the entire
solution was essential to compete in the market. |
| |
| Wipro’s solution |
 |
Scalable and
flexible architecture using OOAD and multi-threaded/process
design |
 |
Windows native
implementation of all DICOM services
 |
Storage,
Q/R, Print, MPPS, MWM, Verification |
|
 |
Development
of Association and Communication Server to
integrate DICOM services to Modality Console
system software |
 |
Testing and validation
of:
 |
DICOM
services using DICOM Validation tools
like AGFA, Osisris and Efilm |
 |
MWM and
MPPS with HIS and RIS |
 |
Storage and Q/R service
with PACS |
 |
Print service with
multiple DICOM enabled printer like
FUJI, Kodak, and AGFA etc. |
 |
Tags as per DICOM
conformance statement |
|
|
| |
| Business benefits |
Adherence
to Industry Standards
 |
Proprietary
DICOM middleware was replaced by industry
standard MergeCOM library for compliance with
the latest DICOM standards |
Zero Change Impact
 |
Stability,
performance and functionality similar to existing
implementation |
Investment Protection
 |
The designed
architecture was both extensible and flexible
providing for investment protection in the
entire solution |
Enhanced Modality Performance
 |
Performance
and quality improvements for existing DICOM
services enabled for improved workflow efficiency
and compatibility of the modality with other
imaging and information systems |
|
| |
|
|
|